Comments on: Sometimes less is more

by: Evan Donovan

Sun, 13 Jul 2008 23:53:37 +0000

If it saves people who’ve never used Ruby before (like me) time, it might be helpful to note that you have to require ‘rubygems’ before you can require ‘active_support’.

by: camblink

Wed, 11 Jun 2008 04:20:54 +0000

This article is useless. Ruby does not lead to readable code.

"The real point is, however, the readability stemming from the succinctness - which you can not achieve in Java, no matter what you do."

That's bullcrap. Ruby is as readable as Perl. STUPID.

by: jack.lan

Tue, 15 Apr 2008 07:59:16 +0000

if you want contact to me , I look forward to you mail !

by: jack.lan

Tue, 15 Apr 2008 07:57:05 +0000

very nice!!!

see you introduce, i just to learn ruby ...

i want to make friend with you , what about you disposition?

by: ruby & java « em Desenvolvimento

Tue, 25 Mar 2008 01:32:43 +0000

[…] http://www.rubyrailways.com/sometimes-less-is-more/ […]

by: Halo

Sat, 15 Mar 2008 10:07:19 +0000

by: AtrotoBoamb

Thu, 10 Jan 2008 10:20:57 +0000

subj
?

by: I am just a programmer » Sometimes less is more

Tue, 06 Nov 2007 14:10:19 +0000

[...] read more | digg story [...]

by: Автомобильный форум

Tue, 06 Nov 2007 02:05:27 +0000

отзывы автофорум

by: Mikel

Mon, 08 Oct 2007 21:45:48 +0000

Instead of this Util.megaBytes(102) + Util.kiloBytes(24) + Util.bytes(10)

you can use static imports (Java 5 required)

import static package.ByteUnitsUtil.* .... megaBytes(102) + kiloBytes(24) + bytes(10) ....

Not as clean as the Ruby one but at least cleaner than your Java example